Petition to ban Greyhound racing in UK nears 60k signatures

Greyhound racing
Image by MICHOFF on Pixabay

A petition to ban Greyhound racing in the UK has so far been signed by almost 60k people, with the deadline for 100k signatures on 30 April 2021. Trudy Baker, coordinator at Greyt Exploitations, explains what it’s all about…

While the Government’s response following the first 10,000 signatures considered a ban unnecessary, they do state that the industry needed to do more to improve conditions at trainers’ kennels as well as be more transparent.

More importantly, the Government’s response also acknowledged that injuries have increased every year since the GBGB started publishing injury data in 2018 despite the industry’s commitment to reduce them. In 2019 4,970 greyhounds suffered injuries – 207 were instantly destroyed trackside and another 348 were destroyed away from the track (method unknown).

“The very fact that the industry has had to introduce an Injury Recovery Scheme is in itself an admission by the industry that dogs will always sustain injuries”

There were another 155 that died suddenly or prematurely, making a total of 710 deaths – 14 a week or 2 every day. The average age of a racing greyhound is only 2-3 years; so bearing in mind they start racing at 15 months, their usefulness only extends to an average of 9-19 months while being forced to perform for the gambling industry.

In 2018 we commissioned a report by Professor Andrew Knight on Injuries in Racing Greyhounds which evidences that racing greyhounds on oval tracks will always result in fatal injuries. This report has been ignored – not dismissed, but ignored – by the GBGB, Efra and Defra, who have all failed to respond to its contents. A brief video on the report can be heard here.

The very fact that the industry has had to introduce an Injury Recovery Scheme to financially support the treatment of injured dogs – to a maximum of £400 – is in itself an admission by the industry that dogs will always sustain injuries. It’s not surprising, then, that you cannot obtain insurance for a racing greyhound.

In 2015 the GBGB entered into a formal agreement with Defra for trainers’ kennels to be independently inspected and UKAS accredited by December 2017, but the GBGB has constantly reneged on this agreement.

In response to our petition the government has stated that “GBGB are in the process of securing UKAS accreditation for their trainers’ kennels scheme. From January 2021, all GBGB trainers’ residential kennels will be audited by independent auditors as part of the process of securing UKAS accreditation”.

However the GBGB has since published a press release last Thursday stating, “The new PAS external residential greyhound kennel inspections are due to start in April. There will be a need to provide grants to trainers to assist them to meet these standards over the next couple of years. Whilst the GBGB already has a budget for trainers’ assistance the BGRF agreed an increase in funding for 2021/22. Increase in spending £310,000.”

“No amount of ineffective ‘window dressing’ welfare commitments will address the suffering and deaths of thousands of puppies and adult dogs racing on the dangerously configured tracks”

If the GBGB are to be believed it will mean that trainers’ kennels will not be independently inspected until 2023 at the earliest and 5 years after the agreed date.

Both Government and the industry insist that more money is needed from the bookmakers to improve the welfare of racing greyhounds, but in our opinion – and as the indisputable research shows – more money will only fund the inevitable injuries and deaths. A ban to end the needless suffering and deaths of thousands of greyhounds every year is the only option.

The GBGB is fully aware of the research and the exact cause of injuries but has shown a determined resistance to publicly acknowledge those important issues – let alone address them, which is why injuries have gradually increased since records began three years ago. No amount of ineffective ‘window dressing’ welfare commitments will address the suffering and deaths of thousands of puppies and adult dogs racing on the dangerously configured tracks.

The GBGB published data is ambiguous and does not publish the total number of dogs racing on tracks in any given year, nor does it make mention of the thousands of puppies that fail to make the grade – or what happens to them.

Hundreds of dogs listed as ‘retired’ by the GBGB still remain in a commercial environment, confined to trainers’ kennels that have failed to comply with a very basic British Standard Institute specification – either used for breeding, forced to routinely donate blood, or simply waiting to be homed. Hundreds more are either sold or given away to be raced abroad or on independent tracks, or used for research and dissection.

Although it absolves the bookmakers of much of their financial responsibility to ensure the welfare of redundant dogs, we do welcome the GBGB’s new Greyhound Retirement Scheme which places a lifelong £400 bond with a dog at the point when they are registered to race, which is then paid to a GBGB-approved rescue to help with neutering, dental treatment and homing costs. So when greyhound racing is banned finances will automatically be in place to ensure the welfare of every dog, alleviating any concerns as to what will happen to the greyhounds when racing is phased out.

Greyhounds are companion animals just like any other breed of dog, but the industry routinely subjects them to unnecessary suffering and destroys them in their thousands. Please sign the petition ‘Ban greyhound racing to end unnecessary deaths & suffering of racing dogs‘.

This is a guest post by Trudy Baker. Want to write for us? Visit or email


  1. That’ll be the same Trudy Baker who thought it was great that there should be a competition to guess which child in a hospital would die first. This was part of her hate campaign against the charity which was holding a fundraising event at a dog track. Her conduct was reported in a local newspaper and she made a complaint against it. Her complaint was NOT upheld.

    • Not surprising that you find it impossible to defend the inherent cruelty the industry depends on for its profits and “When the debate is lost – slander becomes the tool of the loser” – Socrates. The facts of the incident you refer to can be found online and published by Third Sector which incidentally bears no resemblance to your account.

  2. Jayne Conway..what a load of rubbish!. Typical though from someone like yourself who puts the dogs you say you care about on a racetrack where they could sustain terrible injuries or even be killed. Greyhound racing is outdated..I’m glad to see tracks closing. Get your cheap thrills from another source.

  3. I wish I could say Greyt Exploitations and Trudy Baker really had greyhounds at the heart of their thinking……..but they don’t. Very sorry to see Dogs Today publishing this………it will I suspect lose you many readers. By all means publish balanced articles

    • You obviously do not know Trudy Baker very well! She has campaigned tirelessly for many years against this cruel industry. As for Dogs Today losing readers..I disagree…most people nowadays are aware that Greyhounds are just ‘betting units’ and thanks to Dogs Today, the ones that don’t are learning.

  4. It’s time this stopped! So cruel no one should be allowed to treat animals this way, it’s archaic and animals are NOT entertainment!

  5. Do people realise that greyhounds are starved before races they lose weight to make them faster to chase the Hare as they think they can have something to eat wrong wrong this is not a sport this is cruelty legal cruelty I wish people could get some sense of how are these animals are treated they are loving affectionate thoughts killed if they do win the race


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here